
Thaitanium
New User
Oct 5, 2007, 8:54 AM
Post #14 of 14
(1781 views)
Shortcut
|
|
Re: [TerriJ] K1 Kaldness / cheap version
[In reply to]
|
Can't Post
|
|
I completely agree with caveat emptor and offer even more points to ponder.... Having spent many years designing and testing filtration systems, I am skeptical of what I can only refer to as 'hype' in the aquarist hobby. For example, any claim that K1 is positively charged to attract bacteria would qualify as hype. Extracellular polymeric substances and soluble microbial products are in fact what initially adhere to a substrate in the induction phase of biofilm formation (not bacteria). This occurs by Van-der-Waals attraction (not an electrostatic attraction). The ion exchange process on the surface of biofilm does in fact produce a negative charge but this is not the same as saying the bacteria are negatively charged. In the case of waste water treatment, fouling due to sludge significantly reduces flux (therefore reducing filtration). A moving bed media ensures consistent flux and increases DO which assists flocculation and prevents 'cake' accumulation which alleviates the need to backwash. Primarily, aquaria filters benefit from increased flux. DO is (or should) already be high. Backwashing, while burdensome, doesn't create the same kind of sludge management problems in aquaria filters as it does in waste water applications. K1 was designed for waste water filtration. It works great in aquaria filters mainly due to higher and more consistent flux. But, so would any moving media. What do you think it costs to manufacture K1 in bulk? There is certainly a reason it costs more....I think it is advertising. Regards, Neil
|